Rethinking Ley 71: Organizing and Moving Beyond the Current Inflection Point

Interested in more from Marcos A. Vargas, MHA, PA-C?
Explore his AAMPR publications
Read his LinkedIn newsletter, The Trending Caduceus

🇺🇸 English

As Physician Associates in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, we stand at a defining moment that could shape the trajectory of our profession and, more importantly, the accessibility of healthcare for the people we serve. Every day under the current statutory framework is a lost opportunity to fully utilize a highly trained medical workforce capable of expanding access to safe, evidence-based care. Puerto Rico’s 3.2 million residents deserve timely evaluations, efficient treatment plans, and continuity across specialties. Yet the statutory language governing Physician Associate practice that was enacted in 2017 was enacted without a comprehensive understanding of our scope of practice--meaning education, clinical rigor, and the realities of modern team-based medicine practice.

Ley 71, implemented in 2017, introduced statutory limitations that have constrained Physician Associate practice in ways that do not reflect our competencies or patient safety record.

These limitations did not arise from documented deficiencies in care quality, clinical outcomes, or professional preparation. Rather, they stemmed largely from incorrect/problematic terminology used and improper interpretive language embedded within the statute. A semantic issue—lost in translation and lacking contextual clarity—became codified in law. The result was a narrowing of scope that failed to account for the collaborative, evidence-driven models that define twenty-first-century healthcare delivery domestically and globally, for that matter.

The consequences of this legislative language have been substantial. Restrictions have reduced flexibility within healthcare teams, complicated administrative processes, and limited the ability of institutions to deploy Physician Associates where they are most needed. In a system already challenged by workforce shortages, geographic disparities, and fragmentation, these barriers further strain capacity. Clinics experience longer appointment delays. Hospitals struggle with throughput. Specialty services face preventable bottlenecks. Ultimately, patients bear the burden of policies that do not align with contemporary clinical practice.

This issue transcends professional recognition. At its core, it is about patient access. When statutory language restricts a qualified clinician’s ability to practice to the full extent of their training, it restricts the system’s ability to meet community needs. When flexibility is curtailed, continuity suffers. Preventive services may be delayed. Chronic diseases remain uncontrolled for longer periods. Follow-up intervals widen. These are predictable outcomes when workforce capacity is artificially limited in an already strained healthcare infrastructure environment.

The implications are straightforward. Limiting Physician Associate utilization limits the reach of healthcare delivery across the island. It reduces the number of available clinicians who can evaluate, diagnose, treat, and counsel patients in both primary and specialty settings. It narrows institutional options for building efficient, team-based models. It constrains solutions to ongoing workforce shortages that have intensified migration and reduced provider density in many regions. In a system described as siloed and fragmented, restrictive statutory language deepens inefficiencies rather than resolving them.

Addressing these unintended consequences requires thoughtful, organized, and professional advocacy. Advocacy is not separate from patient care; it is an extension of it. When we work to modernize policy language, we are protecting access, strengthening system resilience, and ensuring alignment with current standards of medical practice. Healthcare delivery has evolved significantly over the past decades. Interdisciplinary collaboration is now foundational. Regulations must evolve accordingly to reflect how medicine is actually practiced.

Legislators and policymakers deserve accurate, comprehensive information about the Physician Associate profession. Our education is graduate-level, modeled on the medical school curriculum, and includes rigorous didactic instruction followed by extensive supervised clinical rotations across multiple specialties. National certification standards, licensure requirements, and mandatory continuing medical education ensure sustained competency. Across the United States and internationally, Physician Associates have consistently demonstrated safe, effective outcomes in diverse clinical environments.

Equally important is the recognition that modern healthcare relies on collaborative frameworks. High-performing systems emphasize coordinated, team-based care in which each professional contributes according to education, training, and demonstrated competence. These models improve efficiency, reduce provider burnout, and enhance patient satisfaction. Statutory language that does not reflect collaborative practice risks anchoring Puerto Rico to outdated paradigms while other systems advance toward integrated solutions.

Reform does not require eliminating accountability or oversight. On the contrary, modernization can strengthen clarity and consistency. Updated terminology, precise definitions, and statutory recognition of collaborative practice structures can restore flexibility while preserving safeguards. Clear language reduces ambiguity, streamlines administrative processes, and supports uniform implementation across healthcare institutions. By aligning law with contemporary standards, Puerto Rico can foster stability while maintaining patient protection.

Physician Associates are uniquely positioned to articulate our profession’s value. We understand the operational realities of clinics, emergency departments, operating rooms, and specialty practices. We witness firsthand how limited access affects patient outcomes and community trust. We also see how efficient utilization of our training can improve workflow, reduce wait times, and enhance continuity. Our perspective is grounded in direct patient care and practical system experience.

This moment calls for unity, professionalism, and sustained engagement. Progress requires organization and strategic communication. Constructive dialogue with legislators, administrators, and healthcare partners is essential. Advocacy efforts should emphasize data, patient impact, and collaborative intent rather than confrontation. The objective is not to revisit past decisions with criticism but to refine statutory language so it accurately reflects present realities.

Reexamining the restrictive interpretation embedded in Ley 71 is about forward movement. Laws must adapt as healthcare evolves. Terminology should clarify roles rather than constrain them. Policy should empower qualified professionals to contribute fully within accountable, collaborative frameworks. When statutes accurately represent training and practice standards, the entire system benefits.

Modernizing statutory language would expand institutional flexibility in deploying Physician Associates across primary care, specialty services, surgical practices, and community health settings. It would enable healthcare organizations to respond more effectively to workforce shortages and shifting population needs. It would support continuity of care by allowing clinicians to function consistently within team-based structures. Most importantly, it would enhance patient access across the island.

The broader goal is alignment—alignment between education and regulation, between workforce capability and policy language, and between community needs and healthcare delivery models. When alignment exists, inefficiencies decrease, and system performance improves. When misalignment persists, administrative burdens increase, and patient access narrows. Thoughtful statutory refinement can correct this imbalance.

Our responsibility extends beyond individual practice environments. It includes stewardship of a profession committed to competence, collaboration, and service. By advocating for precise and modern language, we reinforce our dedication to patient welfare and system integrity. We demonstrate readiness to engage constructively in policy development that prioritizes community health outcomes.

Progress will not occur passively. It demands sustained effort, presence in policy discussions, and consistent messaging grounded in professionalism. It requires collaboration with physician colleagues, healthcare executives, and patient advocates who share the goal of expanding safe access to care. Through unity and persistence, meaningful reform becomes achievable.

Take Away

Puerto Rico’s residents deserve a healthcare system that maximizes every qualified professional resource. Physician Associates stand prepared to contribute fully within collaborative frameworks that emphasize accountability and patient-centered care. By correcting unintended statutory constraints and modernizing language to reflect contemporary practice, we can strengthen healthcare access and system resilience across the Commonwealth.

Our patients depend on thoughtful policy. Our healthcare infrastructure requires adaptable solutions. Our profession merits accurate representation within the law. Through organized advocacy and constructive engagement, we can establish a statutory framework that reflects modern medicine and ensures broader access to high-quality care for the people of Puerto Rico.

🇵🇷 Resumen en Español

La Ley 71 permitió el reconocimiento legal de los Physician Associates/Assistants Certificados (PA-C) en Puerto Rico; sin embargo, parte del lenguaje incluido en la legislación no refleja adecuadamente la preparación académica, el modelo de práctica colaborativa ni las funciones que estos profesionales desempeñan en los sistemas de salud modernos.

Como resultado, se han creado limitaciones que restringen la utilización eficiente de los PA-C dentro de los equipos de atención médica. Estas restricciones no surgieron por preocupaciones relacionadas con la seguridad del paciente o la calidad del cuidado, sino por interpretaciones y terminología que no representan con precisión la realidad de la profesión.

En un sistema de salud que enfrenta escasez de profesionales, migración de proveedores y desafíos de acceso a servicios, estas limitaciones pueden dificultar aún más la capacidad de atender las necesidades de la población. Cuando un profesional capacitado no puede ejercer al máximo de su preparación, también se limita la capacidad del sistema para ofrecer atención oportuna y continua a los pacientes.

El artículo destaca la importancia de modernizar el lenguaje de la Ley 71 para alinearlo con los modelos contemporáneos de atención colaborativa. Esta actualización no implicaría eliminar mecanismos de supervisión o responsabilidad profesional, sino establecer definiciones más claras y precisas que permitan una implementación consistente dentro de las instituciones de salud.

Finalmente, se hace un llamado a la unidad, la organización y la participación activa de los PA-C en los procesos de política pública. Modernizar la Ley 71 representa una oportunidad para fortalecer el sistema de salud, mejorar el acceso a servicios médicos y asegurar que las leyes reflejen la realidad de la medicina moderna en beneficio de todos los puertorriqueños.